IDEA: Shortening boot-time
Mike Fedyk
mfedyk at matchmail.com
Sat Jul 24 02:55:08 UTC 2004
Matthew Miller wrote:
>On Sat, Jul 24, 2004 at 03:26:27AM +0200, David Nielsen wrote:
>
>
>>>Size : 21682516
>>>
>>>
>>Bah harddrives are cheap.. unless you are running some kind of odd flash
>>based embedded system or another kind of limited setup depending on
>>python in this manner shouldn't be a problem, and if you do, I highly
>>doubt you would be running a vanilla Fedora Core.
>>
>>
>
>Double bah to that. :)
>
>Just because HDs are cheap isn't a good reason to dump another 20MB on the
>root filesystem.
>
Can't the package be split? All 20MB can't be all[1] for the core
interpreter. Just move the parts needed, and don't parse html or
whatever wasn't taken from /usr in your init scripts.
But why does everything have to be python in fedora/RH? If you're going
to change the init system, shouldn't it be something that can become a
standard across the different distributions? There's already a prior
implementation in ruby if you're going to go with a non-shell based init
system.
Count one negative vote for all non-shell based init proposals.
[1]
rpm -ql python|xargs du -sk|sort -n:
896 /usr/bin/python
912 /usr/lib/python2.3/xml
1260 /usr/lib/python2.3/email
1476 /usr/lib/python2.3/encodings
1772 /usr/lib/python2.3/lib-dynload/japanese
1788 /usr/lib/python2.3/distutils
2272 /usr/lib/python2.3/idlelib
3460 /usr/lib/python2.3/lib-dynload
44168 /usr/lib/python2.3/site-packages
67744 /usr/lib/python2.3
More information about the fedora-devel-list
mailing list