Self-Introduction: Alex Perez

[Nicolas Mailhot]

Le lun, 31/05/2004 à 23:55 -0400, John Major a écrit :
> Hi,
> 
> 	I definitely agree with Per here, as it sounds like it would best be
> suited for Fedora extras.  FC2 already comes with two of the most
> popular desktop environments out and I think it is unlikely that any
> more will be included in FC3.  Many people, as your probably know,
> already feel that the download for FC2 is quite large and is somewhat
> unnecessary as many people do not want all the packages.  I personally
> like the selection as I don't mind the download times however that does
> not seem to be the most popular feeling on this issue.  I agree that it
> is more likely that it would be included in Fedora extras.

Well, seeing how xfce made a stealth entry in FC2, lots of things can
happent once there are quality packages in Fedora Extras.

Cheers,

-- 
Nicolas Mailhot
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: Ceci est une partie de message num?riquement sign?e
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-devel-list/attachments/20040601/596b3508/attachment.sig>