Status and outlook of LSB and FHS compliance of Fedora.

[Matthew T. O'Connor]

On Thu, 2004-06-03 at 05:25, Phil Knirsch wrote:
> I've been looking at how well Fedora is compliant with the latest LSB 
> and FHS specifications lately.
> 
> I came up with a small list of packages that, due to the change in the 
> latest FHS-2.3 and the addition of /srv and /media would seem likely 
> candidates for partiall data migration to /srv:
> 
> bind
> arpwatch
> mailman
> krb5-server
> httpd
> tomcat
> htdig
> openldap
> mysql
> namazu
> inn
> postgresql
> webalizer
> vsftpd
> 
> Only bind, httpd and vsftpd are the really imporant packages with lots 
> of data. Bind will stay where it is mainly for historical reasons as 
> everyone excpects /var/named to exist and contain all the important bind 
> configuration and data.

You don't think postgresql can have a lot of data under /var?  Usually
when I fill up my /var partition it's due to postgresql.