Inflation of explicit build requirements

[Michael Schwendt]

On Fri, 04 Jun 2004 13:59:31 -0700, Shahms King wrote:

> As stands now gcc-g++ needs to be specified in BuildRequires if you're
> using mach as there is nothing else in "C++ build" toolchain that
> requires it.

Then add it to mach's list of 'build' packages.

Do any C++ based packages in Fedora Core buildrequire gcc-c++?
I don't think so. So you can't rebuild those packages in mach unless
you fix mach's 'build' definition.

>  If you leave it out, mach (correctly) removes the gcc-c++
> package before attempting to build it. 

It does not install the package at first.