rawhide report: 20040612 changes

[David T Hollis]

On Mon, 2004-06-14 at 10:20 -0400, Elliot Lee wrote:
> On Sat, 12 Jun 2004, Ivan Gyurdiev wrote:
> 
> > > Removed package gcc34 
> > 
> > Not Cool. Maybe --provide those in gcc?
> 
> My understanding is that all the packages with the *gc?34 dependencies are
> going to need fixing anyways, so providing these deps from gcc is not
> enough. The broken deps are good flags to remind us that the rebuilds are 
> needed.
> 
> Patches always welcome :)

Would this type of thing be avoidable if the gcc34 packages where to
have "Provides: gcc 3.4.0" or similar or would that have dorked all
kinds of other stuff up?  Just looking for ways to properly avoid this
kind of problem/non-problem for future cases.

-- 
David T Hollis <dhollis at davehollis.com>