rawhide report: 20040612 changes

Jakub Jelinek jakub at redhat.com
Mon Jun 14 14:33:51 UTC 2004


On Mon, Jun 14, 2004 at 10:33:35AM -0400, David T Hollis wrote:
> > Patches always welcome :)
> 
> Would this type of thing be avoidable if the gcc34 packages where to
> have "Provides: gcc 3.4.0" or similar or would that have dorked all
> kinds of other stuff up?  Just looking for ways to properly avoid this
> kind of problem/non-problem for future cases.

Not using any of the manual requirements would be IMHO the right thing here.
The packages don't really need libgcj34, they need libgcj.so.5 and
rpm creates those requirements automatically.  libgcj 3.3.x provides
libgcj.so.4 instead.
Similarly with libstdc++.

	Jakub





More information about the fedora-devel-list mailing list