kernel-source vs. kernel-sourcecode (please revert)

[Luciano Miguel Ferreira Rocha]

On Tue, Jun 15, 2004 at 01:34:56PM +0200, Arjan van de Ven wrote:
> 
> On Tue, Jun 15, 2004 at 01:29:34PM +0200, Axel Thimm wrote:
> > > these are ALL wrong then with the 2.6 kernel and with the 2.6 rpms. Really.
> > > Removing custom and all those hacks are *WRONG*. Even on 2.4.
> > > Any kernel module that does that is *BROKEN* build wise. Extremely broken.
> > 
> > Practice says otherwise. kernel module rpms for 2.4 and 2.6 are out
> > there and are in use by several thousands of users without any
> > problems regarding kernel infrastructure.
> 
> they are still broken and violating the rules.

Yes, but the users wouldn't see it like that.

And regarding kernels 2.4.x, I thought /lib/modules/`uname -r`/build was just a symbolic link to /usr/src/linux-`uname -r`?

Regards,
Luciano Rocha

-- 
Consciousness: that annoying time between naps.