kernel-source vs. kernel-sourcecode (please revert)

[Arjan van de Ven]

On Tue, Jun 15, 2004 at 11:05:11AM -0600, Dax Kelson wrote:
> > tree updates come from, and remain stable at all times. That avoids double
> > work an missed bugfixes
> 
> Having kernel-source become noarch is a non-issue from the impact on
> ISVs. The renaming is the problem.

I rather not have renamed it either, however the impact should have been
low; only people who want to build their entire new kernel use
kernel-source (or should). Yum now can at least get to the new package,
which was the sole reason for the rename (well together with up2date)
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-devel-list/attachments/20040615/6b68459d/attachment.sig>