Preliminary OpenAFS 1.3.x RPM for Fedora Core 2

Arjan van de Ven arjanv at redhat.com
Tue Jun 22 06:47:53 UTC 2004


On Tue, Jun 22, 2004 at 01:25:38AM -0400, Matthew Miller wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 21, 2004 at 01:21:37PM +0200, Arjan van de Ven wrote:
> > there's a nitpick bug in the spec file: since your package includes a
> > lot of files from the kernel copied verbatim, the License: tag should
> > include GPL as well.....
> 
> Very good point. I'll add that. Is there a Proper way to specify multiple
> licenses in the license tag? "GPL and IPL", I guess? (As opposed to
> "GPL/IPL" -- that'd be for dual-licensed, right? So annoying that IBM didn't
> chose to just GPL this.)

usually I do something like "parts GPL parts IPL" or so
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-devel-list/attachments/20040622/22ac7c63/attachment.sig>


More information about the fedora-devel-list mailing list