Preliminary OpenAFS 1.3.x RPM for Fedora Core 2

Arjan van de Ven arjanv at redhat.com
Tue Jun 22 12:39:45 UTC 2004


On Tue, Jun 22, 2004 at 08:33:48AM -0400, Alan Cox wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 22, 2004 at 01:25:38AM -0400, Matthew Miller wrote:
> > Very good point. I'll add that. Is there a Proper way to specify multiple
> > licenses in the license tag? "GPL and IPL", I guess? (As opposed to
> 
> For the MODULE_LICENSE() tags there is a GPL and other tag in the tag
> list which is accepted as untainted. 

...; but openafs isn't "GPL and something" it's "IPL". It's just that in
addition to openafs this rpm package has also GPL files (quite a few in
fact) so the RPM license: tag should reflect that.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-devel-list/attachments/20040622/a9e052ce/attachment.sig>


More information about the fedora-devel-list mailing list