no compat-libstdc++ in development?

Jakub Jelinek jakub at redhat.com
Mon Jun 28 07:07:05 UTC 2004


On Sun, Jun 27, 2004 at 07:10:01PM -0400, Jack Howarth wrote:
>     I noticed that while FC2 contains a copy of compat-libstdc++
> (7.4.2-2.96.126) that the current development RPMS are missing this.
> Is this change slated for FC3 and RHEL 4? I still have legacy binaries
> here that require compat-libstdc++ making this change most unwanted.

FC3 has compat-libstdc++-8-3.3.4.1, which contains the 2.96-RH libstdc++.so
as well as GCC 3.3 libstdc++.so.
You cannot compile new programs with 2.96-RH though, which is done on
purpose.  FC3 is going to contain compat-gcc (GCC 3.3.4, hopefully with a
switch for GCC 3.2 binary compatibility), gcc (GCC 3.4.[12]) and gcc35
(preview of GCC trunk, which ought to be binary compatible with 3.4.[12]).
Shipping more compilers is just insane.

	Jakub





More information about the fedora-devel-list mailing list