Submission process (was: Re: Self-Introduction: Michael Tiemann)
Michael Schwendt
fedora at wir-sind-cool.org
Wed Jun 30 22:06:19 UTC 2004
On Wed, 30 Jun 2004 23:18:40 +0200, Rudi Chiarito wrote:
[mach]
> > No. It's in fedora.us already in the "stable" repository (much to the
> > disliking of some people) and the fedora.us build system uses a modified
>
> What are these people's objections? Instability? The use of apt-rpm?
> Security? Anything else?
Some issues collected here: http://tinyurl.com/2hbgy
> My point is: get mach, rpmlint and equivalents into FC (not FE).
rpmlint is not bullet-proof and reports several false positives and misses
many packaging mistakes. If it isn't customized--as the fedora.us rpmlint
is a bit (or also take a look at http://bugzilla.fedora.us/show_bug.cgi?id=1788
)--it is less helpful.
More information about the fedora-devel-list
mailing list