rpm / gpg key question.

Michael Schwendt ms-nospam-0306 at arcor.de
Fri Mar 5 21:04:04 UTC 2004


On Fri, 05 Mar 2004 19:18:30 +0100, Leonard den Ottolander wrote:

> Hello Michael,
> 
> > > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68291
> 
> > When you reopened that bug on 2003-11-20, you made it a duplicate of
> > the older, acknowledged and still open ticket:
> > 
> >   https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90952
> 
> ? Maybe I am misreading you, but I would say 90952 is the dup here...
> Should either of these be closed as such?

Notice the chronological order of the entries in the Activity Log of
the tickets. When 90952 was filed in May 2003, bug 68291 was closed
a very long time ago already. Six months later, when 90952 was still
open and current, 68291 was reopened, becoming a duplicate.

I assume you don't expect bug reporters to go through thousands of old and
closed bugs for old products prior to reporting new and current ones. ;)

> Is anybody aware of where this problem is located (in the code) and how
> it could be fixed?

With a [more] complete implementation of OpenPGP probably.

-- 





More information about the fedora-devel-list mailing list