'outdated' packages in rawhide
Alex Kiernan
alex.kiernan at thus.net
Sun Mar 14 11:41:35 UTC 2004
Warren Togami <wtogami at redhat.com> writes:
> The below is entirely my personal opinion.
>
> Xose Vazquez Perez wrote:
> > package latest rawhide
> > ------- --------- ---------
...
> LIKELY TO BREAK INSTALLER AND DELAY US MORE
> (Integration would be especially difficult)
> -------------------------------------------
...
> > parted 1.6.6 1.6.3
>
Bugzilla #113295 has patches I did which take the parted build from
using a Red Hat specific tarball to a plain upstream one plus
patches. Once you've got that dropping in 1.6.6 was just a case of
updating the tarball and dropping out one of the Red Hat patches which
is fixed upstream (I actually did all this because I was trying to fix
a problem with Mac partitions - it turned out only Red Hat derived
sources exhibited the bug, even though the bug was really in upstream
- seee #112937).
I think the patches have rotted slightly (IIRC I did the patches
against -32 and we're up to -33), but if there's any interest I'll
happily update the patches in the ticket.
--
Alex Kiernan, Principal Engineer, Development, THUS plc
More information about the fedora-devel-list
mailing list