On disttags (was: Choosing rpm-release for fc1 and fdr add-on rpms)

Axel Thimm Axel.Thimm at ATrpms.net
Tue May 18 14:10:28 UTC 2004


On Tue, May 18, 2004 at 08:15:54AM -0500, Rex Dieter wrote:
> On Tue, 18 May 2004, Alexandre Oliva wrote:
> 
> > Oh, that's what you want disttags for?  Sorry, but it isn't going to
> > work.
> 
> I disagree, it certainly can work, if used properly.  This is exactly 
> what many 3rd party repos are doing *right now*.

Yes, I always forget to underline that the disttag scheme is in place
by almost all repos, (including fedora.us, aka not only the external
"3rd parties") using the benefits outlined throughout this thread.

So it already got the field test for longer than a year now.
-- 
Axel.Thimm at ATrpms.net
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-devel-list/attachments/20040518/83462a52/attachment.sig>


More information about the fedora-devel-list mailing list