VPN solution(s) for Fedora Core
James Morris
jmorris at redhat.com
Fri May 21 17:45:08 UTC 2004
On Fri, 21 May 2004, Jason Tackaberry wrote:
> I've done some googling and unfortunately I can't find a thorough,
> independent audit of OpenVPN's design. However, I've also not been able
> to find much in way of vulnerabilities, so it appears to have a good
> track record. This, in combination with Gutmann's remarks in his paper,
> as well as my own understanding of its design, gives me a reasonable
> amount of confidence in OpenVPN. (Vastly more than CIPE, at least,
> which was included in RHL in the past.)
Yes, Gutmann's comments in general are very positive about OpenVPN.
> I don't know much about Openswan, but I do feel that there is room for
> both an IPsec and user space VPN solution in FC.
Openswan is likely to be very useful to folk who need to use IPSec with
NAT-T, xauth etc.
- James
--
James Morris
<jmorris at redhat.com>
More information about the fedora-devel-list
mailing list