RFR: more FC4 Requests

Arjan van de Ven arjanv at redhat.com
Sat Nov 20 14:21:23 UTC 2004


On Sat, 2004-11-20 at 08:49 -0500, Jeff Johnson wrote:
> Are there any other known deficient implementations that might 
> meaningfully be
> removed in FC4?

we should consider replacing/rewriting up2date realistically...
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-devel-list/attachments/20041120/f4a3046a/attachment.sig>


More information about the fedora-devel-list mailing list