/proc/config.gz support on? Why not?

[Arjan van de Ven]

On Wed, 2004-11-24 at 07:48 -0600, Sam Williams wrote:
> On Wed, 2004-11-24 at 12:30 +0100, Alexander Dalloz wrote:
> consideration, which it apparently has not. Enabling
> the /proc/config.gz option is incredibly useful in many Fortune 500
> developer groups, but  since we have these myriad workarounds it should
> probably be removed as a kernel config option.  Thanks for the dialog.

eh you still haven't shown what value it adds over the file *already*
shipped as /boot/config-`uname -r`. Do you *really* care that much about
/boot vs /proc ????
In other words, what is the added value to add these several kb to all
users' kernel?
Without showing what the value is, how can you expect anyone to make the
tradeoff in your favor ?
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-devel-list/attachments/20041124/a3960709/attachment.sig>