Please review this list of potentially missing .so symlinks.
Nalin Dahyabhai
nalin at redhat.com
Mon Nov 29 15:40:18 UTC 2004
On Sat, Nov 27, 2004 at 06:52:56PM -0500, Jeff Spaleta wrote:
> liblber-2.2.so
> libldap-2.2.so
> libldap_r-2.2.so
These don't need to be there. The shared library versioning is meant to
have no effect on how you need to compile applications.
> liblber.so
> libldap_r.so
These should be in openldap-devel, along with libldap.so.
> libnss_db.so
I'd think that's of dubious value, but glibc provides similar links for
the NSS modules it includes, so not having them in nss_db is a bug.
> libpthread.so
This is in /usr/%{_lib}, even if the library lives under /%{_lib}. It
can't be in /%{_lib} because the linker doesn't search that directory
for libraries when you link applications (per "gcc -print-search-dirs").
> libpwdb.so
The shared library to which this link would point is a compat package.
Cheers,
Nalin
More information about the fedora-devel-list
mailing list