[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]

Re: new prerelease of mach for the brave testers

On Mon, 2004-11-08 at 14:30, Thomas Vander Stichele wrote:
> The next hurdle is the dev rpm of FC2 checking /proc/mounts and deciding
> it won't install because there's a devfs mounted.
> I'm not yet sure how I should tackle that.  I could go back to not
> mounting proc but that will give me lots of other errors.  Or, I could
> start overriding calls like open, but that's pretty hackish.

I've been building with mach on a devfs enabled box for a while.  On
that box I'm forced to resort to some dirty hacks to get things to work
but it boils down to mounting devfs (for FC3->FC2 that'll be udev
instead) onto the buildroots /dev.  Then rpm -ivh --justdb'ing the dev
rpm onto the buildroot between doing a mach setup base and mach setup

It's very ugly but it might be more workable from within mach itself. 
Then again, it doesn't give you a 100% true representation of what's in
the dev package on FC2....


  t  o  s  h  i  o  +  t  i  k  i  -  l  o  u  n  g  e  .  c  o  m
                                                          GA->ME 1999

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part

[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]