status of ghostscript

[Nicolas Mailhot]

Le mardi 19 octobre 2004 à 20:20 +0100, Tim Waugh a écrit :

> The other way of looking at it is that ESP would do the work and we
> wouldn't have to. :-)
> 
> Just want to figure out which is more appropriate for Fedora Core.

I don't know the ESP people, but from my POW their fork could easily
turn into something like the ximian oo.o fork (ie a staging area where
distros pool patches instead of reinventing the wheel in their little
linux corner and massively duplicating efforts).

Of course I may be horribly wrong;)

Cheers,

-- 
Nicolas Mailhot
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: Ceci est une partie de message num?riquement sign?e
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-devel-list/attachments/20041019/7aba5710/attachment.sig>