What to do about libc-client (imap)?
Jamie Zawinski
jwz at jwz.org
Mon Sep 20 05:30:55 UTC 2004
Kenneth Porter wrote:
>
> Any reason not to call it uwimap-libs? Why should it get premier naming as
> implementor of IMAP? (I realize it's a reference implementation of the
> protocol by the protocol's author, but we don't call BIND "dns".)
My recollection is that "c-client" was named that to distinguish it from
the *real* IMAP client reference implementation... which was written in
Common Lisp. (Yep, IMAP is that old. (And as broken now as then.))
--
Jamie Zawinski
jwz at jwz.org http://www.jwz.org/
jwz at dnalounge.com http://www.dnalounge.com/
More information about the fedora-devel-list
mailing list