[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]

Re: Regarding Extras package announcements

On Wed, 2004-09-22 at 07:21, Nils O. Selåsdal wrote:
> On Wed, 2004-09-22 at 12:30, Michael Schwendt wrote:
> > If it could be automated, that would be very good, e.g. like "rawhide
> > report". So far, not every packager has posted announcements. The
> > list archives cover maybe 50% of the published packages and updates.
> > Maybe even less.
> imho this should be automated. Most people just use fedora-pkgannfmt
> anyway, which could probably just be run as the bult packages are copied
> to their respective directories !?

The build system would also need (Well... should) also figure out which
changelogs are new since the last package release like the RH Build
System Reports.  Shouldn't be too hard if the changelog header lines are
correctly formatted (QA should be catching that.)

  t  o  s  h  i  o  +  t  i  k  i  -  l  o  u  n  g  e  .  c  o  m
                                                          GA->ME 1999

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part

[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]