Polishing Fedora's specs

[Florian La Roche]

On Wed, Sep 22, 2004 at 07:40:08PM +0200, Marcin Garski wrote:
> Florian La Roche wrote:
> >>Should I report bugs one by one (it will be a lot of them), or in one 
> >>bug all this things?
> >>
> >>IMHO second resolution is better.
> >
> >
> >Probably with a mixture of both we might be able to get some of this stuff
> >in. Can you put diffs somewhere on a web-page?
> 
> I don't have diffs for specs. I do all my tasks in HTML table.
> I think that mixture of both are at one side better, because as I see 
> I'll have to fil about 500 bugs :). Do you want that ;) ?

Well, without seeing the changes I cannot comment really on how to
merge them. Maybe some larger parts could be merged by one person
at Red Hat, maybe we should just put out all those bugzilla lines.

> Also I've already fil this kind of bugs, and had quite different replays.
> At one side very good, but at other eg. #131846 it wasn't so kind :/
> Beside still in development tree xerces-j is in old version and probably 
> was in FC2.

Depends on individual developers. Some have their own devel plan and
just updating the spec file to a newer version is often not an issue,
so having a bugzilla about this doesn't really help.
For a few other developers scann your list might give good suggestions
on what packages we still want to update.

Get your diffs in, more exchange on getting packages updated is certainly
something we want to improve. Danger will be that the closer we go to
FC3, we will stop updating to newer upstream releases and concentrate
more on bug-fixes.

greetings,

Florian La Roche