FC3 and printing from Mozilla
Owen Taylor
otaylor at redhat.com
Mon Sep 27 16:07:57 UTC 2004
On Mon, 2004-09-27 at 07:26 -0500, Rex Dieter wrote:
> > I'd say s/reluctant/strongly opposed/ to xprint but that has been
> > discussed elsewhere and no need for déjà vu all over again.
>
> The only responses I've ever seen/heard from redhat regarding xprint is
> a curt replies like yours.
>
> I don't know about your deja-vu, but all I know is that xprint has
> worked for me personally going back to the mozilla-1.4 days. What's
> troublesome to me is that I see no harm in simply enabling xprint
> support in the mozilla builds, since it does nothing if xprint isn't
> installed and running, yet redhat *still* refuses to even allow that.
To summarize briefly:
- xprint doesn't use the font system that we use everywhere else
(fontconfig)
- xprint can't use the layout system we use everywhere else (Pango)
- xprint doesn't integrate well with the printing system that we
use everywhere else (CUPS)
- xprint can't use the desktop-wide printing dialog (libgnomeprintui)
The first and last are important ones for why enabling Xprint support
in the build is a bad idea; we can't provide as good a font or
printer selection user interface if the printing backend might be
incompatible with our standard technologies rather than closely
integrated with our standard technologies.
Regards,
Owen
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-devel-list/attachments/20040927/43b1d339/attachment.sig>
More information about the fedora-devel-list
mailing list