Recent Fedora Core kernels (plus my SPEC file for 2.6.8-1.541 with Athlon support)

Arjan van de Ven arjanv at redhat.com
Wed Sep 29 06:17:41 UTC 2004


On Wed, Sep 29, 2004 at 07:44:52AM +0200, Matias Feliciano wrote:
> > >         };
> > 
> > and how is that not valid ??
> > 
> 
> I am not a crypto expert but if it's valid key it seems easy to crack.
> No ?

It's actually an empty keyring without keys :)


> So, what is the significant difference between "rpmbuild -bp" and
> kernel-sourcecode: EXTRAVERSION in Makefile.

yep that is something worth fixing

> If we want "rpmbuild -bp" close to the "old" kernel-sourcecode, perhaps
> we should add "BuildPreReq: gtk2-devel, qt-devel" in kernel-2.6.spec .

ew no ;)
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-devel-list/attachments/20040929/d7a7faa2/attachment.sig>


More information about the fedora-devel-list mailing list