Fedora meeting Mono Half-Way
Dan Williams
dcbw at redhat.com
Thu Dec 15 13:02:21 UTC 2005
On Thu, 2005-12-15 at 07:21 -0500, Benjy Grogan wrote:
> On 12/15/05, Patrick Barnes <nman64 at n-man.com> wrote:
> Benjy Grogan wrote:
> > Hello:
> >
> > I know this topic has been mentioned over and over, and
> everyone is
> > irritated by it. But why not meet the Mono project
> half-way? Why
> > can't the hal-sharp and the dbus-sharp, and gtk-sharp
> add-ons be
> > included in the fedora packages?
> Patents
>
>
> There are patents in Mono. But what patent is there in a mono binding
> do d-bus? D-bus has no patent issues.. So a mono binding is just
> like a c++ binding, or a c binding.. or any binding.
>
> I'm talking about including the mono bindings in Fedoro system
> libraries.
>
> I can't see how there would be a patent in a mono binding for d-bus?
Because you have to have Mono first, before you can build the bindings
for dbus/hal/etc. And to make the bindings useful, you must build them.
Dan
More information about the fedora-devel-list
mailing list