[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]

Re: status of up2date and rhn-applet



On Thu, 2005-12-01 at 16:54 +0100, Axel Thimm wrote:
> 
> Well, w/o even testing the repo and its contents how can you make a
> statement on whether and which packages are unneccessary updates, and
> whether or not stability of your system is at stake?

So it seems things have changed since I last tried ATrpms in the FC3
days.  Back then, every rpm seemed to dep on an atrpms package, which in
turn depd on a lot of core replacements.  This doesn't seem to be the
case anymore.  This is why I made the disclaimer that I hadn't tried
atrpms in a while.

-- 
Jesse Keating RHCE      (geek.j2solutions.net)
Fedora Legacy Team      (www.fedoralegacy.org)
GPG Public Key          (geek.j2solutions.net/jkeating.j2solutions.pub)
 
Was I helpful?  Let others know:
 http://svcs.affero.net/rm.php?r=jkeating


[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]