yum clean bug
seth vidal
skvidal at phy.duke.edu
Thu Dec 8 21:59:34 UTC 2005
On Thu, 2005-12-08 at 23:51 +0200, Panu Matilainen wrote:
> On Thu, 2005-12-08 at 15:55 -0500, Jeff Spaleta wrote:
> > On 12/8/05, Luciano Miguel Ferreira Rocha <strange at nsk.no-ip.org> wrote:
> > > Yes. Because I'm doing cache operations, not repository operations. Or
> > > rather, that's what I thought I was doing, so it would be intuitive to
> > > me.
> >
> > So for completeness what your saying is that you think
> > yum clean packages should clean all packages from all enabled and
> > disabled repos by default?
> >
> > and yum clean headers should clean all headers from all enabled and
> > disabled repos by default?
>
> Well, I actually think it should.
Seriously? That seems completely backward to me.
it's like saying rsync --exclude=/some/path should not actually exclude
that path.
or that a disabled samba share shouldn't ACTUALLY be disabled.
why on earth do you think yum should do what it's been told NOT to do?
-sv
More information about the fedora-devel-list
mailing list