yum clean bug
Neal Becker
ndbecker2 at gmail.com
Fri Dec 9 01:29:49 UTC 2005
Patrick Barnes wrote:
> IMHO, yum is behaving exactly as it should. When I disable a
> repository, yum has no idea why I have done it, and should not disregard
> my wishes and change anything about that repository. As for
> repositories that no longer have configurations, I don't want yum making
> any assumptions there, either. I have no problems going in and cleaning
> out the cache manually if space becomes an issue. It would be easy
> enough to create a cron job to do the job. If someone wants to create a
> script to go along with yum-utils or to stand alone, I would see nothing
> wrong with that. I'm sure that would be a welcomed idea. I also
> wouldn't complain about a '--sanitize' option in yum, but the current
> behavior is what I would expect and want.
>
Well, for the record, I disagree. Is there really any reason for disabling,
except that the repo doesn't play nicely with others, so that I don't want
it enabled by default? If so, why would I run clean all, and not want to
clean it?
The fact is, I have a couple of repos disabled by default, such as
updates-testing. They had eaten lots of disk space. I did clean all. I
certainly did not expect this behavior. If this is really the way we want
it to act, please clearly document that we need to add --enablerepo=* to
clean disabled repos.
More information about the fedora-devel-list
mailing list