[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]

Re: yum clean bug

On Fri, 2005-12-09 at 18:27 +0100, Nicolas Mailhot wrote:
> If yum is so concerned about this "data" safety why is it storing it in
> a filesystem tree specifically reserved for stuff that can be removed
> without notice?
> But anyway this was not my point.

I don't see anything in the FHS that says things will come in randomly
and remove stuff w/out notice.  It says that the data should be
re-creatable.  The data is re-creatable.  What more do you want?  All
we're doing is drawing a line on what is acceptable for yum to 'guess'
the user wants.

> >> Guys,
> >> if you don't want to listen to others, and have only abuse to offer, don't
> >> answer questions at all. Why do you think every single yum thread is
> >> degenerating lately ? Every single poster but you is brain-damaged ?
> > 
> > The only 'abuse' I see 
> When people take shots at quotes from a neutral text like the FHS, that
> shows they're only interested in harassing people that disagree with
> Seth, and have nothing to contribute to the discussion itself.
> (I imagine it's as embarrassing for Seth as having an "helpful" friend
> yell the sky is green because you're disagreeing with someone who noted
> in the course of his argument the sky is blue)

I'm really sorry you view it as this.  I don't know what to say that
will allow you to see what we're really trying to do, so I won't even

Jesse Keating RHCE      (geek.j2solutions.net)
Fedora Legacy Team      (www.fedoralegacy.org)
GPG Public Key          (geek.j2solutions.net/jkeating.j2solutions.pub)
Was I helpful?  Let others know:

[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]