Fedora meeting Mono Half-Way
Benjy Grogan
benjy.grogan at gmail.com
Thu Dec 15 12:21:08 UTC 2005
On 12/15/05, Patrick Barnes <nman64 at n-man.com> wrote:
>
> Benjy Grogan wrote:
> > Hello:
> >
> > I know this topic has been mentioned over and over, and everyone is
> > irritated by it. But why not meet the Mono project half-way? Why
> > can't the hal-sharp and the dbus-sharp, and gtk-sharp add-ons be
> > included in the fedora packages?
> Patents
There are patents in Mono. But what patent is there in a mono binding do
d-bus? D-bus has no patent issues.. So a mono binding is just like a c++
binding, or a c binding.. or any binding.
I'm talking about including the mono bindings in Fedoro system libraries.
I can't see how there would be a patent in a mono binding for d-bus?
Benjy
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-devel-list/attachments/20051215/0f366da7/attachment.htm>
More information about the fedora-devel-list
mailing list