[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]

Re: Fedora meeting Mono Half-Way

On 12/15/05, Alexander Larsson <alexl redhat com> wrote:
> On Thu, 2005-12-15 at 16:42 +0100, Gianluca Sforna wrote:
> > On 12/15/05, Davide Bolcioni <db-fedora 3di it> wrote:
> > > > There are some killer-apps built using Mono.  Fedora should get cheeky
> > > > and see what they can get away.
> > >
> > > Myself, I would welcome equivalents of the above apps NOT using mono
> > > instead, but that's just me. How many virtual machines and frameworks
> > > are we supposed to install ?
> > >
> >
> > Actually, I am wondering about this topic from some time, that is,
> > what is done in Beagle with Mono that is so difficult to be done in C
> > or C++ ?
> Its not beagle the app that is problematic, it is mono the framework.
> However beagle doesn't work without mono, so shipping beagle without
> mono is not an option.

What I think he was asking was what functionality does Mono have that
makes it easier to develop in Mono rather than C or C++.

My answer to that question is that I believe there is nothing but Mono
being a Novell/Ximian developed env they are using Beagle (as well as
F-Spot and a couple of others) as a proof of concept to prove that its
a good platform etc. and also as a sort of if you want this you have
to also have this.


[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]