[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]

Re: rawhide report: 20051217 changes



Yeah that rebuild was almost as much wasted energy as writing a mail
about a rebuild that wasted energy (or replying on a mail about a
rebuilt that wasted energy) ;-)

- Erwin

On Sat, 2005-12-17 at 20:58 +0100, Tomasz Kłoczko wrote:
> Dnia 17-12-2005, sob o godzinie 10:40 -0500, Build System napisał(a):
> [..]
> > logwatch-7.1-4.1
> > ----------------
> > * Fri Dec 09 2005 Jesse Keating <jkeating redhat com>
> > - rebuilt
> [..]
> > mailcap-2.1.19-1.1
> > ------------------
> > * Fri Dec 09 2005 Jesse Keating <jkeating redhat com>
> > - rebuilt
> > 
> > man-pages-cs-0.16-5.1
> > ---------------------
> > * Fri Dec 09 2005 Jesse Keating <jkeating redhat com>
> > - rebuilt
> [..and all other man-pages-*..]
> 
> Sorry but what is the sense rebuilding this noarch packages.
> IMO this only waste of time and energy.
> 
> > perl-Devel-Symdump-2.03-20.1
> > ----------------------------
> > * Fri Dec 16 2005 Jesse Keating <jkeating redhat com>
> > - rebuilt for new gcj
> [..and all other perl modules. Specialy packed in noarch packages..]
> 
> Next: how chages in libgcj affects perl modules ??? specialy noarch perl
> modules ? :-o
> This next plain waste of time and energy for supply build systems.
> 
> kloczek
> 


[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]