scim-libs not signed error when using yum??

[Warren Togami]

Horst von Brand wrote:
> Jens Petersen <petersen at redhat.com> wrote:
>> Gianluca Cecchi wrote:
>>> Package scim-libs-1.4.2-9.i386.rpm is not signed
> 
>> Packages in FC Devel are not usually signed (except for packages included
>> from test releases).
> 
> Could The Powers That Be consider signing the packages? Even with a
> rawhide-only key? That way I'd sleep a little better, knowing I've got no
> malicious gunk installed on my machine.

It is possible that we can do this in the future after we implement a 
key piece of infrastructure, but until then it will remain unsigned like 
all past years of rawhide.

I am pushing for signing of rawhide using a separate less trusted 
automatic signing key.  It will happen one day...

Warren Togami
wtogami at redhat.com