Royalty free gstreamer plug-in
Rahul Sundaram
sundaram at redhat.com
Tue Dec 27 14:04:09 UTC 2005
Hi
>
>
>
>>Do you mean the stance on providing only open source software without restrictions?
>>
>>
>
>Yes. And that's not to say that I disagree with the stance. In fact, I
>agree with it given that "restrictions" are well-defined.
>
Right. The restrictions are pretty well defined at this point. The
project goals are well advertised and active on the lists I believe
knows about it.
>Being
>belligerent about looking into potential workarounds is not a show of
>good faith. And, when you do not show good faith, you lose people.
>Maybe you don't care; that's fine. But, it's good to be reminded that
>the stances we take can and will alienate a bunch of people. It's the
>truth whether you "much rather change the world instead of going along
>with it" or not.
>--
>
How is a Free and open source stance not showing good faith? . There
are over seventy distributions based on Fedora. Its not religion or
whims. Yes it will alienate a few proprietary software supporters who
will have to get the software from elsewhere. What exactly is your
solution that you are suggesting?. Vague notions dont help resolve
anything.
--
Rahul
Learn. Network. Experience open source.
Red Hat Summit Nashville | May 30 - June 2, 2006
Learn more: http://www.redhat.com/promo/summit/
More information about the fedora-devel-list
mailing list