FC5 and Yum Plugins

Michael A. Peters mpeters at mac.com
Thu Dec 29 19:12:38 UTC 2005


On Thu, 2005-12-29 at 12:57 -0500, Jeff Spaleta wrote:
> On 12/29/05, Thorsten Leemhuis <fedora at leemhuis.info> wrote:
> > But if the maintainer is the same in livna and extras I don't see a big
> > problem -- yes, it's a problem, but has anybody a better solution?
> 
> Its only a problem in the context of this "protectbase by default" discussion.

None of those are "base" packages, but you won't find me complaining if
livna took the Fedora sox spec file and added libmad-devel and
lame-devel to the BuildRequires ... which would be a "base" package
being replaced ...




More information about the fedora-devel-list mailing list