FC5 and Yum Plugins

[Jesse Keating]

On Fri, 2005-12-30 at 13:10 +0100, Axel Thimm wrote:
> How would you do that w/o checking the specfile itself? If package foo
> from core is replaced with foo compiled with different build options,
> or a bugfix that is required in a context not interesting in core (so
> it will not make it into "updates") or similar, how can you
> distinguish it from arbitrary package updates?

This I don't know.  There doesn't seem to be anything currently in nvr
that allows for vendor comparison.  So the only thing I can think of is
explicit requires on a specific package nvr that includes your vendor
tag.  No >< stuff, just =.  Of course there may be smarter ways to do
this....

-- 
Jesse Keating RHCE      (geek.j2solutions.net)
Fedora Legacy Team      (www.fedoralegacy.org)
GPG Public Key          (geek.j2solutions.net/jkeating.j2solutions.pub)
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-devel-list/attachments/20051230/82903b6a/attachment.sig>