ATrpms and FC5/RHEL5

[Axel Thimm]

So, is there interest to have ATrpms for FC5 less overlapping with
core packages?

If so, is there any redhat.com folk that would be willing to add
versioned obsoletes/provides to core specfiles? That's neccessary to
ensure upgradability.
-- 
Axel.Thimm at ATrpms.net
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-devel-list/attachments/20051231/a17bfca7/attachment.sig>