[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]

ATrpms and FC5/RHEL5



So, is there interest to have ATrpms for FC5 less overlapping with
core packages?

If so, is there any redhat.com folk that would be willing to add
versioned obsoletes/provides to core specfiles? That's neccessary to
ensure upgradability.
-- 
Axel.Thimm at ATrpms.net

Attachment: pgpyMYORfaeyF.pgp
Description: PGP signature


[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]