radical suggestion for fc4 release

[Arjan van de Ven]

On Tue, 2005-02-01 at 09:50 -0500, Jeff Spaleta wrote:
> On Tue, 1 Feb 2005 09:28:45 +0000 (GMT), Mark J Cox <mjc at redhat.com> wrote:
> > What would be incredibly useful is to move (to being a Provides) the CVE
> > names for issues that we're including a backported fix for.  Where we've
> > moved to an upstream version that contains fixes those CVE names are less
> > important as they can be deduced by a simple NV check.
> 
> I look forward to building pathological packages that have a requires
> on a CVE name provides.

fedora-secure-system 

could require all the CVE's that are ciritical to be fixed 
yum update fedora-secure-system 
would then only pull security updates down....

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-devel-list/attachments/20050201/86d9d7dd/attachment.sig>