radical suggestion for fc4 release

Nicolas Mailhot Nicolas.Mailhot at laPoste.net
Tue Feb 1 19:02:24 UTC 2005

Le mardi 01 février 2005 à 12:13 +0100, Ralf Corsepius a écrit :

> I disagree. Adding %changelogs to specs is not any different from $Log$.
> Having an entry in an rpm-header containing the last change might be
> useful for users being interested in the reason for a new rpm release,
> but I fail to understand why having a full %changelog-history inside of
> rpms or metadata files is useful.

All that means is you never maintained a complex RH/FC system for a long

rpm changelogs are the first line of defense to understand what the heck
happened to hose a long-working system. On Raw Hide they are as vital as
the admin coffee.

Nicolas Mailhot
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: Ceci est une partie de message num?riquement sign?e
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-devel-list/attachments/20050201/efd12632/attachment.sig>

More information about the fedora-devel-list mailing list