radical suggestion for fc4 release

Nicolas Mailhot Nicolas.Mailhot at laPoste.net
Tue Feb 1 19:09:45 UTC 2005

Le mardi 01 février 2005 à 14:07 -0500, seth vidal a écrit :
> > All that means is you never maintained a complex RH/FC system for a long
> > period.
> > 
> > rpm changelogs are the first line of defense to understand what the heck
> > happened to hose a long-working system. On Raw Hide they are as vital as
> > the admin coffee.
> And keeping the last 6 months or a year of them is fine.
> but cmon - do we really need 7 yrs or more worth of changelogs IN the
> rpm?

Well, there are still people that to focused Raw Hide upgrades on
systems partially upgraded from RH 7.1 to 7.3
(not kidding at all, really)

Nicolas Mailhot
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: Ceci est une partie de message num?riquement sign?e
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-devel-list/attachments/20050201/04646266/attachment.sig>

More information about the fedora-devel-list mailing list