Adding FOP Support to xmlto to fix PDF generation (Bug 147472)

Rudi Chiarito nutello at
Tue Feb 8 18:44:20 UTC 2005

On Tue, Feb 08, 2005 at 11:30:05AM -0700, Trever L. Adams wrote:
> FOP lacks many features, and it seems no one has touched it since 2003.
> Are you sure you really want to add it?

Sad, but true: for my DocBook documents, despite it having serious
problems with some indexterm elements, the DSSSL toolchain still
produces better output than the alternatives.

As to FOP, it's not dead, it just smells funny. I think there's a 
rewrite in progress.


More information about the fedora-devel-list mailing list