Source versus Patch (in pcmcia-cs)
Bill Nottingham
notting at redhat.com
Fri Feb 11 22:27:47 UTC 2005
Pete Zaitcev (zaitcev at redhat.com) said:
> Does anyone know why the startup script in pcmcia-cs is carried in the SRPM
> as a Source, instead of Patch?
>
> Source3: rc.pcmcia
>
> Do we have any guidelines about what should go into Source, and what should
> go into into Patch?
Generally, it's included as a Source: when either a) upstream doesn't
ship one or b) we'd have to mangle the upstream one enough that it's
simpler to keep our own copy.
Bill
More information about the fedora-devel-list
mailing list