Summary of Dropped Packages

[Florian La Roche]

On Thu, Feb 24, 2005 at 03:20:59AM -0500, seth vidal wrote:
> >> 
> >> Er, do you mean exim-doc, which was split into a separate package? Exim
> >> itself is fairly tiny and is a potential candidate for being the default
> >> MTA. There was no discussion of removing Exim entirely, and it was
> >> shipped in FC3.
> >
> >For exim I think we should continue to put it into FC-devel, but
> >only exclude it from FC4 if the space requirements need this removal.
> >
> >greetings,
> 
> I'm thinking for the future - why don't we consider pulling this
> discussion off of fedora-devel and onto fedora-maintainers? Sound
> reasonable?

Yes, that will be the right spot.

greetings,

Florian La Roche