Exim as default MTA.

seth vidal skvidal at phy.duke.edu
Fri Feb 25 16:21:08 UTC 2005

On Fri, 2005-02-25 at 11:10 +0000, Ron Yorston wrote:
> Bill Nottingham <notting at redhat.com> wrote:
> >David Woodhouse (dwmw2 at infradead.org) said: 
> >> On Thu, 2005-02-24 at 16:25 -0500, Matthew Miller wrote:
> >> >Dropping it may be drastic; it could be moved to extras.
> >> 
> >> Until FC5, those two are equivalent. Having accepted that FC4/i386 isn't
> >> going to fit onto 4 CDs
> >
> >FC4 i386 *is* going to fit on 4 CDs (almost certainly). It's x86_64
> >and possibly ppc that is over.
> and, earlier,
> Elliot Lee <sopwith at redhat.com> wrote:
> >Something that needs to be mentioned - it was decided that it was better
> >to go to 5 CDs for now than to kick eclipse and the Java stuff out.
> Will you @redhat.com people please get your stories straight?
> And if it is 5 CDs can we have Xfce back, please?

 This isn't about 'getting stories straight' it's not like red hat is a
single mind acting in unison. It's not like any open source project is
like that either.

Here's the deal. Xfce got dropped out of core b/c we're trying to shave
off some misc packages. Do I think it'll be in extras? Yes. I actually
think it will:
 1. be in extras
 2. be kept more updated from extras
 3. not be a problem for you.

I know it's hard to believe but we're trying to get everything together
and sometimes it just takes a little time.


More information about the fedora-devel-list mailing list