FC3 -> FC4 Upgrade? (was Re: reducing distribution CD count)
Chuck R. Anderson
cra at WPI.EDU
Fri Feb 25 22:20:33 UTC 2005
On Fri, Feb 25, 2005 at 03:07:46PM -0500, Eric Warnke wrote:
> lprng was never part of core ( afaict )
LPRng was in Red Hat Linux 9 and earlier.
> I don't install things from fedora.us, freshrpms, dag, ... if I need
> something outside core I rebuild it, test it and deploy it in a local
> repo. I don't think it's unreasonable to let the user know that they are
> breaking there system in anaconda.
Anaconda won't upgrade your self-built packages, then. It won't
remove them, either. Same as the packages removed from FC4.
> or why. No attempt has been made to clarify the exact ammount of space
> that need to be made up. No one has attempted to bzip2 packages that
> might save space. Between suggestions already made we could reduce the
> overage by half. Careful inspection of the packages could reveal more
> dead packages and then larger items could be examined for cutting.
You could do this. Anyone who cared enough could.
More information about the fedora-devel-list
mailing list