Package pruning for FC4 and beyond

[David Woodhouse]

On Sun, 2005-02-27 at 12:17 -0500, Chuck R. Anderson wrote:
>No, nano replaced pico.  cone (in Extras) is intended to replace pine.
>I don't think nano should be removed from Core.  In fact, when cone is
>ready, I think it should be brought into Core.

Nano could really do with UTF-8 support. I'm very tempted to ship a CVS
snapshot for that reason, although that's generally not a good thing to
do.

Cone still lacks the capability to get at IMAP servers by rsh/ssh,
doesn't it?

-- 
dwmw2