Package pruning for FC4 and beyond

David Woodhouse dwmw2 at
Sun Feb 27 17:21:41 UTC 2005

On Sun, 2005-02-27 at 12:17 -0500, Chuck R. Anderson wrote:
>No, nano replaced pico.  cone (in Extras) is intended to replace pine.
>I don't think nano should be removed from Core.  In fact, when cone is
>ready, I think it should be brought into Core.

Nano could really do with UTF-8 support. I'm very tempted to ship a CVS
snapshot for that reason, although that's generally not a good thing to

Cone still lacks the capability to get at IMAP servers by rsh/ssh,
doesn't it?


More information about the fedora-devel-list mailing list