[fedora-d-rh] Re: FC3 -> FC4 Upgrade? (was Re: reducingdistribution CD count)

Otto Haliburton ottohaliburton at comcast.net
Sun Feb 27 22:37:31 UTC 2005

> -----Original Message-----
> From: fedora-devel-list-bounces at redhat.com [mailto:fedora-devel-list-
> bounces at redhat.com] On Behalf Of seth vidal
> Sent: Sunday, February 27, 2005 10:44 AM
> To: Development discussions related to Fedora Core
> Subject: Re: [fedora-d-rh] Re: FC3 -> FC4 Upgrade? (was Re:
> reducingdistribution CD count)
> On Sun, 2005-02-27 at 10:33 -0500, Mail Lists wrote:
> >On Sun, Feb 27, 2005 at 02:09:44AM -0500, seth vidal wrote:
> >> I will say this once again and for all, if anyone wants to find
> >> themselves taking more responsibility in fedora ALL THEY HAVE TO DO IS
> >
> >   Very valid points.  However - things are not black and white -
> >   read LKML - Linus listens - even to non kernel hackers - it
> >   is one of his many remarkable strengths.
> and where have we implied that users won't be listened to? But as it is
> if you want to listen to users on fedora-list and everyone else on
> fedora-devel-list it is a full time job JUST to read the email.
> -sv
I agree, but you have to listen to all of the complainers as well as
contributors b/c quite often the new ideas come from the complainers rather
than the contributors, cause generally developers are very happy with the
status quo. No complaints means everything is okay and no need to develop or
create new things.  My problem is that everything is argued, some things
should be allowed to die in the wind, they just aren't worth the effort to
respond to.  i.e. insulting someone for their ignorance of a topic or
trivial suggestion, these things should just be allowed to die and push the
good complaints or the good ideas and treat everything else as a quirk of
nature.  That would probably make these threads a hell of a lot shorter.

More information about the fedora-devel-list mailing list