radical suggestion for fc4 release

[Nicolas Mailhot]

Le mardi 01 février 2005 à 14:14 -0500, seth vidal a écrit :
> > > And keeping the last 6 months or a year of them is fine.
> > > 
> > > but cmon - do we really need 7 yrs or more worth of changelogs IN the
> > > rpm?
> > 
> > Well, there are still people that to focused Raw Hide upgrades on
> > systems partially upgraded from RH 7.1 to 7.3
> > (not kidding at all, really)
> > 
> 
> And why exactly do we care about them for purposes of this dicussion?

Because they are real users. A few megs of cd space savings are not
sufficient to justify putting part of our users in deep s*t.

-- 
Nicolas Mailhot
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: Ceci est une partie de message num?riquement sign?e
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-devel-list/attachments/20050201/5f928921/attachment.sig>